Get marketing news you’ll actually want to read

Glaze testing begins with a clear objective: to understand how three core variables interact within your studio environment. Atmosphere includes oxygen levels, kiln atmosphere types (oxidizing, reducing, or neutral), and the presence of other gases that can alter color and glaze fusion. Thickness refers to the coating applied to pottery, which can vary from near-blanket coverage to a deliberately thin wash. Firing temperature is not a single point but a range that includes peak temperature, soak duration, and cooling rate. Establish a controlled baseline piece, then introduce one variable at a time while keeping the others constant. Document observations precisely, so patterns emerge rather than isolated anomalies.

Start with a simple test batch to establish your baseline glaze behavior. Choose a familiar glaze recipe and apply it at a standard thickness on a standard body. Fire the test piece in your regular firing schedule while maintaining a known atmosphere. Record the resulting color, glaze surface texture, and any pinholing or crawling. Then adjust one variable—perhaps a slightly cooler soaking time or a marginally different kiln atmosphere—and re-fire. The goal is to isolate effects, enabling you to separate glaze chemistry from environmental influence. Over several iterations, you’ll see where responses plateau and where they shift meaningfully, guiding subsequent refinements with confidence.

Atmosphere has a powerful, nuanced role in glaze development. Oxidizing conditions tend to brighten colors and promote stable gloss, while reducing atmospheres can deepen reds and greens or mute certain oxides. Neutral atmospheres offer a middle ground. Minor shifts—such as introducing a small percentage of reducing gas or altering venting—can yield noticeable color changes or texture differences. Record gas mixes, furnace seals, and the resulting glaze gloss, crazing, or crawling. When you compare two cycles that only differ by atmosphere, you’ll learn which colorants are sensitive and which frits hold up across conditions. This insight guides glaze selection and firing recipes that align with your studio goals.

Thickness influences surface character and functional durability. A light coat may reveal underlying body color and create delicate halos, while a heavy application can encourage opaqueness or surface imperfections like pinholes. To test thickness, apply multiple passes of the same glaze at distinct intervals, ensuring clean, consistent coats. Use identical bisque temps and firing schedules to keep variables controlled. After firing, assess surface uniformity, gloss level, and any pinholing or crawling. Document how color shifts with thickness and whether the glaze forms a glassy surface or a matte one. This data helps you predict performance on different wares and adjust brushing, spraying, or dipping techniques accordingly.

Firing temperature is the most consequential variable for many glazes. Even small changes in peak temperature or hold time can alter color, translucency, and texture. Begin with your normal firing range, then create a set of milder and hotter variants. Keep the same glaze recipe and body to isolate temperature effects. Compare color, pulse of glaze flow, and surface integrity across the firing spectrum. Note any changes in melting behavior, such as blistering or pinholes that emerge at higher ranges. Conversely, reduced heat may yield underfired hues or dull surfaces. The key is consistent pacing and precise temperature readings from your kiln controller.

Alongside temperature, cooling rate and soak duration shape glaze outcomes. A fast cool can trap colors and reduce mature glaze flow, while a slow cool may enhance crystallization or crawling tendencies. In your test matrix, vary only the cooling profile while maintaining the same peak temperature and atmosphere. After each run, inspect the glaze for changes in gloss, color depth, and surface texture. Record how long the glaze remains in a given melt state and how this timing influences final appearance. The resulting dataset helps you tailor a firing protocol that yields predictable outcomes, even as you explore new glaze ideas.

With three core variables mapped, design a parallel set of experiments focusing on combinations. For instance, pair a medium thickness with a mid-range temperature under oxidizing conditions and then repeat the same setup with a reducing atmosphere. You’ll begin to see interactions that a single-variable test may miss. Record environmental conditions in detail: kiln oxygen readings, venting practices, and the exact shelves or supports used. Note the glaze’s final look in different lighting to catch subtle tonal changes. This phase of experimentation teaches you which combinations consistently deliver desirable outcomes and which ones require recipe tweaks to maintain stability.

As you accumulate results, build a reference chart that translates specific observations into actionable tweaks. For example, a bright blue glaze that blushes under reducing conditions may require a higher alumina content or a different flux to stabilize color. A thick glaze might be prone to crawling at higher temperatures, suggesting a reduction in silica or adjustments to particle size. The chart becomes a living document: you add entries, highlight repeatable successes, and tag anomalies for further investigation. The aim is not just to chase novelty but to establish reliable pathways to the looks you want across your typical work.

Practical data collection improves consistency across batches. Use a standard form for every test: glaze name, body type, thickness range, atmosphere, peak temperature, soak time, and cooling profile. Include visual notes and color references, along with any measurements of surface roughness or glaze thickness using simple calipers. Collect qualitative impressions and quantitative data, then compare across runs to identify trends. The discipline of documentation reduces guesswork and helps you communicate results with collaborators or students. Over time, you’ll see which variables matter most for your glazes and which changes yield diminishing returns.

When you’re ready to apply tests to real production pieces, select a focused subset of the most stable, versatile recipes. Use your best-performing glaze under a controlled atmosphere and standard thickness, then test its behavior on a range of pots with varying contours. Observe how the glaze behaves on rims, concave surfaces, and trapped areas. Evaluate not only color and gloss but also durability, stain resistance, and resistance to crazing. The objective is to translate laboratory findings into practical studio practice that translates into repeatable quality across a wide array of wares.

Build a simple, repeatable glaze testing cycle for ongoing development. Schedule periodic re-tests after equipment maintenance, such as kiln element replacements or vent recalibration, because equipment changes can shift results. Create a rotating set of baseline pieces that travel through your experiments regardless of new glaze ideas. Share your findings with apprentices or peers to gather fresh perspectives. A collaborative approach often reveals overlooked variables, like atmospheric humidity or seasonal kiln performance, that affect glaze behavior. By keeping the cycle steady and inclusive, you sustain a learning culture around glaze mastery.

Finally, translate your testing regimen into practical studio guidelines. Write a concise handbook that explains how to set up atmospheres, apply thickness, and choose firing profiles for common glaze families. Include checklists for preparing bodies, cleaning kilns, and recording data. Use the handbook as a training tool so new makers can replicate your process and build confidence quickly. Over time, your glaze testing regimen becomes an integral part of your creative workflow, empowering you to push boundaries while maintaining reliability and quality.