Get marketing news you’ll actually want to read

Crafting a successful motion for summary judgment hinges on a disciplined approach to facts and evidence. Begin by identifying every material issue in dispute and then isolate facts that are clearly undisputed. This requires a careful review of the complaint, answer, and discovery responses to map exactly what the record shows. The aim is to present a clean, navigable narrative where the moving party demonstrates that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact. While arguments about law are essential, the court will largely rely on the factual record. A well-structured brief helps the judge assess whether summary judgment is appropriate at this stage of litigation.

A strategic overview of undisputed facts involves more than listing them; it requires organizing the facts to align with the applicable legal standard. Start with the governing rule of decision and then connect each fact to the elements of that rule. Use precise citations to deposition transcripts, admissions, and documentary exhibits. Avoid introducing disputed assertions, extraneous details, or argumentative phrasing that could trigger a trial-on-facts contest. The strongest submissions minimize interpretive disputes and present a polished, straightforward depiction of what is and is not contested, with an emphasis on proving that the material facts are unambiguous.

The core of any summary judgment filing is the compilation of undisputed facts in a logically coherent sequence. Begin with a concise introduction that states the standard for summary judgment and the court’s governing framework. Then present uncontested facts in numbered paragraphs, each tied to a citation. Where a fact may appear to be contested, provide a carefully calibrated explanation of why it should be treated as undisputed, backed by evidence. Attorneys should consider including a short statement of the procedural posture and a notice of any local rules governing motions. A precise, fact-driven narrative reduces the opportunity for opposing counsel to manufacture disputes later.

Exhibits constitute the backbone of a strong motion. Attach copies of key documents and organize them chronologically or by issue, with an index cross-referencing each exhibit to the corresponding factual proposition. Use deposition excerpts to corroborate critical facts, but ensure that the excerpts do not overstate testimony or create ambiguity. Affidavits from knowledgeable witnesses can enhance clarity, as long as they comport with admissibility standards and are not merely argumentative. The goal is to provide a complete, self-contained evidentiary package that a reviewing judge can evaluate without needing to consult the underlying case file.

Practical tips for assembling supporting evidence begin with document management. Create a master file that includes pleadings, discovery responses, contracts, communications, and expert reports. Then produce a pinpointed highlight set that draws the court’s attention to critical pages, dates, signatures, and other verifyable data. Where possible, obtain official records or certified copies to bolster credibility. Consistency matters: ensure that the formatting, labeling, and citation style are uniform across all documents. A coherent evidentiary package reduces the risk that a court will require further proof or reject a seemingly self-serving summary of facts.

In writing the statement of undisputed facts, clarity and brevity are essential. Each paragraph should present a single fact or a tightly connected cluster of facts, followed by a citation to the precise evidence. Avoid legal conclusions; instead, describe the factual circumstances and the evidentiary support. When a fact appears potentially disputed, flag it, but provide a targeted explanation why it is still undisputed for purposes of the motion. A well-crafted narrative invites the judge to read the evidence rather than scan for holes, and it helps prevent unnecessary factual battles in later proceedings.

Beyond undisputed facts, a persuasive motion requires a careful legal argument. Demonstrate how the undisputed facts satisfy each element of the applicable standard, such as lack of genuine issue for trial or the movant’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Cite controlling statutes, case law, and persuasive authorities with pinpoint accuracy. The argument should be concise, logical, and free of rhetorical excess. The court should be able to see, at a glance, that the undisputed record resolves every essential element, leaving no reasonable question for trial. Effective briefing won’t substitute for evidence, but it will ensure the evidence is read in the right light.

Anticipating opposing arguments is a hallmark of a strong motion. Consider the lines of attack likely to be raised by the nonmoving party and preemptively address them. Provide a counterpoint that explains why cited evidence does not create a genuine issue, or why certain assertions lack material significance under the governing law. Craft responsive sections that respond to anticipated challenges without turning the brief into a debate. By demonstrating awareness of likely disputes and promptly overriding them with solid, cited facts, the moving party enhances the chance of a favorable decision without trial.

The role of affidavits and declarations deserves careful handling. When used, ensure sworn statements are based on personal knowledge, set forth facts clearly, and include attestations to knowledge and competency. Affidavits should avoid hearsay, speculation, and conclusory statements. They should be consistent with the attached documentary evidence, reinforcing the narrative of undisputed facts rather than diverging from it. If any weaknesses appear in a declaration, consider supplementing with additional exhibits or a corroborating deposition. The credibility of sworn statements often depends on their alignment with the record and the absence of contradictions.

Drafting the motion to marry facts with law is a balancing act. The document should be readable, with a clean structure, logical transitions, and careful formatting. Use a clear heading for each factual group and a corresponding legal analysis. Citations must be exact, and pinpoints should guide the judge to the precise page or paragraph where the argument is supported. A well-organized motion reduces time spent parsing the record and increases the likelihood that the court will grant relief without delaying discovery or trial. Precision and restraint are allies in summary judgment practice.

Finally, consider the procedural timing and local rules governing summary judgment. Ensure that all deadlines, notice requirements, and service obligations are met. Check whether a separate statement of undisputed facts is required and, if so, prepare it with the same rigor as the main brief. Local courts may impose formatting constraints, page limits, or specific citation rules; failure to comply can render otherwise solid arguments ineffective. A proactive compliance mindset saves last-minute headaches and demonstrates professional diligence. Planning ahead allows for thorough review and revision before submission.

In sum, preparing for motions for summary judgment is an exercise in disciplined fact gathering, precise documentation, and disciplined legal reasoning. By isolating undisputed facts, assembling robust evidence, and presenting a clear, well-supported narrative, you increase the likelihood of an efficient resolution. The process rewards early, methodical work and a strategic focus on what the record actually proves. Attorneys who invest in meticulous preparation build credibility with the court, minimize the risk of reversible errors, and position their clients for a favorable outcome without the need for trial. A thoughtful approach today can prevent costly litigation down the line.