Get marketing news you’ll actually want to read

Accessibility begins in the planning stage, not after a prototype is built. In Figma, start by creating a clear color hierarchy with high-contrast pairings that meet WCAG recommendations. Use native contrast checks and plugins to simulate real-world scenarios, such as glare or low lighting, and adjust text sizes for legibility. Outline focusable elements early, labeling them with semantic names so you can map tab order precisely. Build components that reflect responsive behavior across breakpoints, ensuring that controls remain discoverable as the layout shifts. Document accessibility criteria within the design file so teammates can align during reviews and iterations without ambiguity.

Prototyping accessibility in Figma hinges on rigorous state management. For every interactive element, create distinct variants for default, hover, focus, pressed, and disabled states. Apply consistent typing scales and line heights to prevent text from wrapping awkwardly during interaction. Use the prototyping flow to simulate keyboard traversal with deliberate tab orders, and verify that visual focus indicators appear prominently in each state. Leverage color tokens and opacity adjustments to convey status changes without relying solely on color. Finally, couple these states with descriptive annotations that explain the intent behind each transition, reducing guesswork for engineers and QA testers.

The ability to test contrast in Figma goes beyond static screenshots. Incorporate dynamic color tokens so you can swap palettes without losing accessibility benchmarks. Create a dedicated contrast checker frame that displays contrast ratios for multiple text/background pairings in real time. When you adjust a color, watch for any potential violations at small font sizes or in dense content areas like cards and lists. Pair these checks with typographic notes detailing minimum sizes, line lengths, and preferred fonts for accessibility. This method keeps contrast considerations front and center as your design evolves through feedback cycles and stakeholder reviews.

Focus states are a critical accessibility signal for keyboard users. In Figma, model focus rings that scale with element importance, and ensure they remain visible against all backgrounds. Build a system of consistent, keyboard-friendly behaviors for menus, modals, and widgets. Use component variants to demonstrate focus movement across different UI regions, such as headers, sidebars, and content panels. Document the visual cue patterns—shape, thickness, color, and animation duration—so developers can reproduce the exact experience. Include corner cases where focus should trap within a modal or escape to the surrounding content with a single keystroke.

Keyboard navigation testing in a prototype benefits from mirroring real devices. Set up a linear tab order that follows logical reading flow, and validate skip links for long pages. In Figma, annotate each interactive element with its tab index and expected behavior when activated. Build fallback paths for users who rely on assistive tech by simulating aria-like roles in labels and descriptions. Use descriptive tooltips that appear on focus, ensuring that keyboard users receive the same contextual information as mouse users. Pair these practices with accessible naming conventions, so screen readers announce meaningful labels instead of cryptic IDs.

Another essential area is ensuring components remain accessible as content scales. Design responsive patterns that preserve contrast, focus cues, and keyboard operability across breakpoints. For example, a navigation menu should retain a visible focus ring on every breakpoint, and a search input must preserve legible text and clear focus indicators when the layout compresses. Create adaptive typography rules so text remains readable on small screens without sacrificing emphasis or hierarchy. Validate that form controls, buttons, and controls keep their accessible hit areas regardless of device width. Document how each component behaves in constrained spaces to guide developers through edge cases.

Color accessibility often hinges on more than hue; it requires luminance and contrast discipline. In Figma, centralize color tokens and ensure every text layer references tokens rather than fixed values. Build a test canvas that automatically reports contrast ratios for headings, body text, and UI labels against background components like cards or banners. Inspect combinations on white and dark surfaces, as well as composite layers with overlays. When adjustments are necessary, revise both foreground and background colors in tandem to maintain balance. Capture rationale for each change in design notes so reviews can follow the logic behind color decisions across iterations.

Readability is also about spacing and alignment. In Figma, experiment with line length, line height, and letter spacing to optimize legibility for diverse users. Use grids and baseline alignment to keep text blocks tidy, especially in dense content areas. Verify that bullets, captions, and annotations retain alignment during responsive shifts. Consider high-contrast typography options such as bold weights or larger scales for emphasis without overwhelming the reading flow. Record accessibility-friendly typography guidelines within the design file, including when to switch to more legible fonts for critical messages or warnings.

A robust prototype documents not only visuals but intent. In Figma, attach accessibility notes to each component describing its role, state logic, and keyboard behavior. Use links to external WCAG references or internal design system guidelines to provide quick context for engineers. Create a separate accessibility blueprint that aggregates key decisions about color, contrast, focus, and navigation. This living document should be updated as components evolve, guaranteeing that the engineering team can reproduce the experience precisely. Include exportable assets and measurement data to support QA checks and ensure consistent implementation across platforms.

Effective handoff also means providing measurable criteria. Define success metrics for accessibility tests, such as minimum contrast ratios, focus visibility thresholds, and timing for focus ring animation. Include recommended device simulations, like high-contrast modes or ambient lighting variations, to validate robustness. Encourage developers to run automated checks in their build pipelines and to use the prototype as a single source of truth. When conflicts arise, resolve them through traceable decisions anchored in the design system and user research outcomes.

Start with a clear accessibility policy embedded in your design system. This policy should articulate goals, constraints, and non-negotiable accessibility criteria. Build reusable components that already embody contrast, focus, and keyboard behavior requirements, so every new feature inherits accessibility from the start. Use variants to cover common interaction patterns, ensuring consistent behavior across pages and devices. Maintain a habit of testing early and often with real users, which helps you avoid costly retrofits. Keep documentation tight but comprehensive so teams can quickly understand the rationale behind each design choice and reproduce it as needed.

Finally, embrace iteration as your strongest ally. Accessibility is not a one-off checklist but a continuous conversation between designers, developers, and users. In Figma, cycle through design, prototype, test, and refine phases with transparent communication. Leverage user feedback to refine contrast, focus visibility, and navigation flow, and document lessons learned for future projects. Build a culture where accessibility is visible in every screen, not an afterthought. By maintaining rigorous, repeatable processes within Figma, you create enduring, inclusive experiences that serve a broad audience across products and platforms.