Get marketing news you’ll actually want to read

When teams begin a color management journey, they confront a spectrum of variables that can distort intent. Device displays vary in brightness, contrast, viewing angles, and color profiles, while software interpretations of color might differ between environments. A robust workflow starts with a shared color language: calibrated monitors, standardized ICC profiles, and a clearly defined gamma. In practice, this means selecting a master profile that aligns with your target devices, then applying it consistently across design tools. Establish governance around color decisions, including naming conventions, swatches, and reference images. The goal is to minimize guesswork and ensure that a hue you approve in one context looks the same in many contexts.

Figma and Adobe applications provide complementary strengths for color management, but they require deliberate integration. In Figma, rely on consistent color values by using swatches and color styles rather than duplicating hues across documents. In Adobe tools, manage color using Adobe Color Engine profiles and Color Management policies that respect embedded ICC data. Synchronize these systems by creating a central library of calibrated swatches and ensuring that both Figma and the Adobe apps you rely on can access and honor them. Communicate color decisions through a shared design system, so everyone uses interchangeable tokens rather than ad hoc values that drift over time.

A disciplined approach begins with a documented profile strategy that clearly names the intended workflow. Decide which working spaces to adopt for RGB and CMYK, define how soft proofing should behave, and specify how embedded profiles are treated during import and export. In practice, this means choosing a primary working space, locking it in as the default for new projects, and instructing teams to convert colors only when necessary. The aim is to prevent accidental profile shifts that change saturation or hue. Provide a quick-reference guide with common pitfalls and corrective steps so new contributors can align rapidly with established expectations.

Build a centralized color library that travels between Figma and Adobe Creative Cloud applications. This library should host core palettes, brand tokens, and accessibility-tested combinations that perform reliably on a range of devices. Use semantic naming for colors to reduce drift as projects scale, and attach metadata indicating luminance targets, contrast ratios, and intended usage. Regularly audit the library against real-world devices and environments. Encourage designers to link to the shared library rather than duplicating colors locally, which often leads to fragmentation and inconsistent results.

Calibration is not a one-off task; it is an ongoing practice. Start with consistent hardware setup: a color-calibrated monitor, a color-managed printer if print is involved, and, where possible, a controlled lighting environment. Document the exact hardware configuration and the calibration toolchain used. For most teams, monthly checks are sufficient, with more frequent checks during critical campaigns. Record results in a shared log and set thresholds that trigger recalibration when deviations exceed acceptable margins. The moment a team member notices a color discrepancy, there should be a defined path to revalidate both device settings and swatch integrity.

Testing across devices is essential to ensure that color holds up under real-world conditions. Create a standard test suite that includes reference images, diverse environments, and representative devices. In Figma, verify that colors in components render consistently when exported as PDFs or PNGs and when embedded in web content. In Adobe tools, run color checks during export to ensure profiles are preserved and that soft-proofing reflects expected output. Document any deviations with concrete screenshots, device details, and precise color values. Use this evidence to refine the library and to educate team members about how perceptual differences may surface.

Governance is the backbone of scalable color management. Create a clear policy outlining roles, responsibilities, and decision rights for color approvals. Establish a procedure for updating palettes as the brand evolves, and ensure changes propagate automatically through connected libraries and styles. Include rollback options so teams can revert to a known-good state if new decisions produce unintended results. Include a change log that records rationale, dates, and who sanctioned adjustments. When governance is visible and predictable, teams experience less friction, and color integrity improves across all outputs and touchpoints.

Education complements governance by building confidence and competency. Offer short workshops on color space concepts, perceptual uniformity, and the practical effects of profile embedding. Provide hands-on exercises that compare how a single swatch looks in Figma versus in a suite of Adobe tools, highlighting differences and how to compensate. Share real-world case studies that illustrate successful color harmonization across devices. Encourage a culture of questioning: if a color looks off in one context, investigators should trace it back to profiles, libraries, or workflow steps rather than blaming the display.

Start by defining a master profile and a primary working space that everyone respects. Set your preferences in Figma to use the master profile by default and enable color profile warnings where available. In Adobe apps, enable consistent color management settings and ensure embedded profiles are retained during exports. Create a single source of truth for color tokens and consolidate duplicates into a shared library. Encourage teams to pull colors from this library in both design and documentation assets, reducing the risk of drift when projects move from concept to production.

Implement a versioned color library with change notifications. Each update should include a concise description of the rationale and the impact on existing work. Establish a review cadence for major changes, and require approval from brand and accessibility stakeholders before deployment. Ensure automated checks verify that exported files preserve the correct color profiles and that no unintended conversions occur in either Figma or Adobe workflows. This structure helps prevent subtle shifts that accumulate over time and compromise consistency.

Accessibility considerations are inseparable from color management. Define minimum contrast ratios and ensure tokens meet those standards across backgrounds. In practice, this means testing color pairs in both light and dark modes, and validating that the system remains legible on common devices. Use semantic naming to tie color roles to their accessibility purposes, such as primary action, text on dark background, or warning indicators. Document any trade-offs between brand aesthetics and readability, and develop recommended fallbacks for devices with limited color fidelity. This proactive approach helps you sustain usability alongside brand personality.

Finally, cultivate a culture of iteration and shared responsibility. Color management thrives when designers, developers, and stakeholders collaborate, review results, and celebrate improvements. Build lightweight dashboards that visualize device coverage, profile adherence, and library utilization, so teams can spot gaps quickly. Schedule regular reviews of color decisions in relation to campaigns, product launches, and accessibility audits. By keeping color management visible, teams stay aligned, errors decrease, and the visual language remains consistent whether a file is opened on a laptop, a tablet, or a large-format display.