Get marketing news you’ll actually want to read

When colleagues undermine a project, the first priority is to establish a clear, evidence-based account of what happened and why it matters. Begin by observing patterns rather than isolated incidents, noting dates, names, and specific actions, plus the impact on timelines and morale. This groundwork helps you separate personal feelings from observable behavior and gives you a factual platform for discussion. Frame the issue around common goals rather than personalities, emphasizing how undermine actions disrupt coordination and diminish outcomes for the team. A careful, non-confrontational tone signals professionalism and invites others to engage in problem-solving rather than defensiveness.

Before initiating any conversation, map the desired outcomes: a restored sense of trust, clarified roles, and improved coordination. Decide who should be present, what you need to hear from each participant, and how you will measure progress. Practically, prepare an agenda that names the behavior, its impact, and the concrete changes you expect. Choose a private, neutral setting to reduce defensiveness and allow for frank exchange. Open with a shared objective, acknowledge the value each member brings, and then describe the undermining behavior with specific examples. Conclude by outlining next steps and inviting feedback on the path forward.

A successful discussion hinges on language that minimizes blame while maximizing accountability. Use statements that focus on observable actions and outcomes, such as “When X happened, the team experienced Y” rather than “You always do X.” Invite the other person to share their perspective and any constraints they faced, which can reveal misalignments or knowledge gaps. Throughout the conversation, maintain neutral body language, steady eye contact, and a calm voice. If emotions rise, pause briefly to regroup, then continue with the original structure. The goal is a collaborative resolution, not a victory, so keep the tone constructive and future-focused.

After laying out the concerns, propose concrete, time-bound remedies that reconnect individuals to the team’s shared objectives. This may involve revising responsibilities, clarifying decision rights, or establishing check-ins to track progress. Emphasize mutual accountability: when responsibilities shift, all parties should commit to transparent updates and early flagging of potential issues. Documented agreements prevent ambiguity and provide a reference point if behaviors recur. Encourage the undermining party to propose corrective actions, which fosters ownership and reduces defensiveness. If needed, escalate to a supervisor or mediator following agreed internal channels.

To sustain improvements, embed regular, outcome-focused reviews into the team rhythm. Schedule short, recurring check-ins that assess alignment with milestones, quality standards, and cross-team dependencies. Use objective metrics where possible, such as delivery rates, defect reduction, or customer feedback. When misalignment appears, address it promptly through brief, factual updates rather than extended debates. Encourage teammates to acknowledge progress publicly and support one another’s efforts. This steady cadence reinforces a culture of transparency and consistency, making it less likely for undermining behaviors to slip back into routine operations or go unaddressed.

In cross-functional settings, competing priorities can masquerade as resistance to collaboration. Create a shared language that translates individual goals into team outcomes, and map dependencies across functions. Hold a joint planning session where each function explains its constraints and invites input on sequencing tasks. This practice reduces hidden friction by turning speculative conflict into structured negotiation. When disagreements arise, document the trade-offs and rationale for the chosen path, then monitor adherence to the agreed plan. A transparent decision log helps sustain trust and clarifies expectations across disciplines.

Psychological safety is essential when addressing undermining behavior. Leaders and teammates should model curiosity, not defensiveness, and acknowledge mistakes without fear of retribution. Encourage questions that reveal the underlying reasons behind actions, such as workload pressure, unclear priorities, or resource gaps. By validating concerns and focusing on systemic improvements, teams can transform friction into learning. Recognize and celebrate small wins that result from candid conversations and cooperative problem-solving. Over time, this climate reduces the instinct to undermine and increases willingness to cooperate even under pressure.

When a pattern of undermining persists, introduce a formal support mechanism that preserves relationships while enforcing accountability. This can include coaching for the individual, targeted skill development, or reallocation of duties to better match strengths. Simultaneously, reinforce the value of collaboration by highlighting examples where cross-functional synergy produced measurable benefits. Ensure all steps are documented: conversations, agreed actions, timelines, and metrics. A balanced approach that pairs development with clear consequences helps maintain trust and reduces resentment on other teams who may bear the burden of misalignment.

For sustained results, embed the practice of early intervention. Train managers and team leads to recognize early warning signals, such as delayed responses, minimal participation in meetings, or frequent interruptions. Quick, respectful checks can prevent escalation and preserve working relationships. When escalation is unavoidable, use a structured process that preserves dignity for all involved. The process should include a neutral third party if necessary and a clear path to resolution, including agreed timelines for progress reviews and re-evaluation of roles or processes as needed.

The long-term health of a cross-functional team depends on consistency and fairness in enforcing norms. Establish a formal code of conduct that applies to everyone, with specific examples of undermining behaviors and corresponding consequences. Ensure access to confidential channels for reporting concerns and provide assurance of non-retaliation. Periodically audit how the code is applied to avoid perception of bias. When outcomes are unfavorable, offer paths for remediation that emphasize learning and improvement rather than punishment.

Documentation is the backbone of credible conflict management. Record decisions, responsible owners, timelines, and review dates in a centralized, accessible place. This repository becomes a reference point for future disputes and helps new team members understand past dynamics. Accompany notes with a summary of the impact on performance and a recap of agreed remedies. Regularly review the archive to ensure it reflects current expectations and to identify recurring patterns that may require systemic changes rather than individual interventions.

Finally, cultivate empathy as a strategic capability. Encourage teammates to articulate their pressures, constraints, and aspirations, and respond with listening, rather than quick judgments. Empathy does not mean tolerance for dysfunction; it means understanding where others are coming from so that solutions can be tailored and more durable. Pair empathy with accountability, and you create a resilient collaborative environment where undermining behaviors are swiftly addressed and productive working relationships endure across functional boundaries. This combination supports both personal growth and collective performance in complex, dynamic teams.