Get marketing news you’ll actually want to read

In any merger or acquisition, the working capital adjustment acts as a balancing mechanism between the purchase price and the immediate liquidity and operational needs of the business at closing. Buyers want a cushion that ensures ongoing operations aren’t disrupted after the deal, while sellers hope to avoid overreaction to normal fluctuations in account balances. The core principle is clarity: define the target working capital with precision, anchor it to a verifiable baseline, and spell out how variances will be measured and resolved. A well-constructed adjustment provision minimizes disputes by outlining permitted adjustments, the timing of determinations, and the process for final true-up calculations long after the deal closes.

To craft robust adjustments, start with a detailed definition of target working capital, including the exact components from current assets and liabilities that will be used for the calculation. Include exclusions for non-operational items and one-time events that could skew results. Build in a clear, objective measurement date and a transparent methodology that references standard accounting principles. Consider including a collar or range to accommodate normal business seasonality, thereby reducing the likelihood that minor, routine fluctuations trigger post-closing true-ups. Finally, ensure all parties agree on how disputes will be resolved, whether through expert determination, independent accounting review, or expedited arbitration.

The next layer of protection lies in the true-up mechanism itself, which should function as a low-friction, objective process rather than a heated negotiation battle. The agreement should specify how the final working capital will be calculated, who will prepare the initial estimate, and what documentation will accompany the true-up, such as bank statements, ledgers, and reconciliations. A practical approach is to designate a neutral accountant or a “true-up person” who has access to source data and can confirm whether the target was met, exceeded, or underperformed. This role should operate within a defined timeframe, with clear expectations for communication and access to necessary records.

Arms-length behavior during the true-up period matters just as much as the numbers themselves. The contract should prohibit strategic changes to working capital for the purpose of manipulating the ultimate adjustment, such as accelerating or delaying payables, inventory write-downs, or extraordinary adjustments that don’t reflect ongoing operations. Create guardrails by tying adjustments to evidence-based metrics and offering a fair opportunity for both sides to present supporting documentation. Consider adding a pre-closing audit right limited to major line items if disputes arise. The goal is to deter opportunistic behavior while preserving a cooperative mood through the final reconciliation.

Seasonality is a frequent pitfall in working capital calculations. Businesses that experience monthly or quarterly cycles can show misleading snapshots if measurements are taken at inopportune moments. To prevent this, anchor the target to a rolling average or adjusted annualized figure that smooths out normal fluctuations. Include explicit language about what constitutes normal seasonality and how variances outside the established range will be treated. A robust provision will also address intercompany balances, affiliate transactions, and intercompany loans that can distort the picture if left untreated. By anticipating seasonal patterns, you minimize disputes and preserve deal value.

Another essential feature is risk-sharing provisions that allocate downside and upside appropriately. Rather than a rigid one-way true-up, negotiate a sliding scale or cap on post-closing adjustments that balance buyer protection with seller incentives. For example, you might set caps on the maximum possible adjustment or create a process for sharing a portion of any excess working capital above the target with the seller under certain conditions. These mechanics should be tied to objective performance signals rather than subjective judgments, reinforcing alignment while keeping expectations realistic for both sides.

Documentation quality often determines how easily post-closing adjustments are resolved. Include a succinct, well-organized data room section dedicated to working capital items, with visibility into the underlying invoices, reconciliations, and bank statements. The more you invest in clean, source-backed records, the smoother the true-up process will be. In addition, specify the roles and responsibilities for the seller’s team during the post-closing period to prevent gaps in data provision. Clear ownership, proactive communication, and a centralized channel for questions and updates reduce friction and help both parties stay aligned as the business transitions.

In practice, you should pair the agreement’s language with a practical implementation plan. Schedule periodic checkpoints during the post-closing period to review the evolving working capital position, even if no formal dispute is anticipated. These reviews create a collaborative environment and can catch data discrepancies early. If adjustments are material, determine whether interim true-ups are necessary or if you will wait for a final, comprehensive reconciliation. A well-planned cadence signals good governance and reduces the probability of “surprise” moments that could derail the deal’s value.

Tax and regulatory considerations often intersect with working capital calculations, particularly when cross-border components are involved. Different jurisdictions may have distinct definitions of current assets and liabilities, which can lead to misalignment if not addressed in the contract. To avoid this, explicitly harmonize the accounting framework and provide for handling any tax-related adjustments that arise from timing differences or category reclassifications. This alignment minimizes post-closing debates and ensures the final numbers reflect the true economic reality rather than procedural quirks. A disciplined approach to tax treatment strengthens the integrity of the true-up mechanism.

Additionally, consider including a provision for post-closing adjustments to be adjusted for any subsequent changes in accounting standards or practices that materially affect the calculation. While this is unusual, it can prevent a future disconnect between the financial statements and the agreed-upon targets. The more you anticipate in the agreement, the less room there is for disagreement. However, keep these adjustments tightly scoped to avoid a perpetual loop of renegotiation. A thoughtful balance protects both sides and sustains the deal’s long-term value.

Finally, enforceability matters as much as the mathematics. Include clear remedies for breaches or disputes related to the working capital adjustment, such as a defined escalation path, access to independent auditors, and, if necessary, a mechanism for equitable resolution that avoids court battles. Consider caps on liability for misstatements within the working capital calculation to create a predictable risk framework. The contract should also spell out how these remedies interact with other closing conditions, such as earnouts, retention payments, or covenants. A practical, enforceable framework reduces the likelihood of costly post-closing litigation.

For founders and investors negotiating these terms, the key is to approach the process with disciplined specificity and collaborative spirit. Do not treat working capital adjustments as a mere formality; they govern the day-to-day viability of the post-close business. Build a checklist of the items that matter most, establish objective measurement standards, and secure independent oversight where needed. Maintain a focus on transparency and timely communication so that both sides can rely on the true-up framework. When done well, the adjustments become a routine, almost invisible part of the transfer, preserving value, reducing risk, and supporting a smooth transition for all stakeholders.